The effects of weekly augmentation therapy in patients with PiZZ α1-antitrypsin deficiency.

BACKGROUND: The major concept behind augmentation therapy with human α(1)-antitrypsin (AAT) is to raise the levels of AAT in patients with protease inhibitor phenotype ZZ (Glu342Lys)-inherited AAT deficiency and to protect lung tissues from proteolysis and progression of emphysema. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term effects of augmentation therapy (Prolastin) on plasma levels of AAT, C-reactive protein, and chemokines/cytokines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum and exhaled breath condensate were collected from individuals with protease inhibitor phenotype ZZ AAT deficiency-related emphysema (n = 12) on the first, third, and seventh day after the infusion of intravenous Prolastin. Concentrations of total and polymeric AAT, interleukin-8 (IL-8), monocyte chemotactic protein-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, vascular endothelial growth factor, and C-reactive protein were determined. Blood neutrophils and primary epithelial cells were also exposed to Prolastin (1 mg/mL). RESULTS: There were significant fluctuations in serum (but not in exhaled breath condensate) levels of AAT polymers, IL-8, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and vascular endothelial growth factor within a week of augmentation therapy. In general, augmented individuals had higher AAT and lower serum levels of IL-8 than nonaugmented subjects. Prolastin added for 3 hours to neutrophils from protease inhibitor phenotype ZZ individuals in vitro reduced IL-8 release but showed no effect on cytokine/chemokine release from human bronchial epithelial cells. CONCLUSION: Within a week, augmentation with Prolastin induced fluctuations in serum levels of AAT polymers and cytokine/chemokines but specifically lowered IL-8 levels. It remains to be determined whether these effects are related to the Prolastin preparation per se or to the therapeutic efficacy of augmentation with AAT.

[Comparison of four identical electronic noses and three measurement set-ups]. / Vergleich von vier baugleichen elektronischen Nasen und drei Messaufbauten.

BACKGROUND: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) can be used as biomarkers in exhaled air. VOC profiles can be detected by an array of nanosensors of an electronic nose. These profiles can be analysed using bioinformatics. It is, however, not known whether different devices of the same model measure identically and to which extent different set-ups and the humidity of the inhaled air influence the VOC profile. METHODS: Three different measuring set-ups were designed and three healthy control subjects were measured with each of them, using four devices of the same model (Cyranose 320™, Smiths Detection). The exhaled air was collected in a plastic bag. Either ambient air was used as reference (set-up Leipzig), or the reference air was humidified (100% relative humidity) (set-up Marburg and set-up Munich). In the set-up Marburg the subjects inhaled standardised medical air (Aer medicinalis Linde, AGA AB) out of a compressed air bottle through a demand valve; this air (after humidification) was also used as reference. In the set-up Leipzig the subjects inhaled VOC-filtered ambient air, in the set-up Munich unfiltered room air. The data were evaluated using either the real-time data or the changes in resistance as calculated by the device. RESULTS: The results were clearly dependent on the set-up. Apparently, humidification of the reference air could reduce the variance between devices, but this result was also dependent on the evaluation method used. When comparing the three subjects, the set-ups Munich and Marburg mapped these in a similar way, whereas not only the signals but also the variance of the set-up Leipzig were larger. CONCLUSION: Measuring VOCs with an electronic nose has not yet been standardised and the set-up significantly affects the results. As other researchers use further methods, it is currently not possible to draw generally accepted conclusions. More systematic tests are required to find the most sensitive and reliable but still feasible set-up so that comparability is improved.

[Smelling diseases? A short review on electronic noses]. / Krankheiten erriechen? Eine kurze Übersicht über elektronische Nasen.

Non-invasive pulmonary diagnostics is a promising and interesting field in respiratory medicine. Beside exhaled breath condensate, there is an increasing interest in alternative and faster techniques such as electronic noses (EN). EN aim to mimic or improve the sense of smelling. Different types of EN have been employed in research so far. In addition to ion mobility spectrometry and mass spectrometry, ENs that consist of various biopolymer sensors for the sensing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been tested. VOCs bind to the sensors depending on size, structure, hydrogen binding and polarity. This leads to physical alterations, e. g., swelling resulting in a change of resistance. The smell print represents composite patterns in contrast to single compounds, and the distinction between different categories is achieved by pattern recognition algorithms. Other types of EN like mass spectrometry and ion mobility spectrometry are capable of identifying even single analyte fractions provided that their characteristics have been saved in data repositories. The non-invasive nature, onsite availability and relatively cheap sampling are advantages of ENs that underly the increasing interest in their use for medical purposes. Some promising results have already been published. This review aims to describe the state of the art in brief form.